[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
Sat May 14 19:33:17 EST 2005
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #912 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-05-14 19:33 -------
Created an attachment (id=913)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=913&action=view)
A key of "hostname" implies port 22, also fix HashKnownHosts
Implement semantics proposed in comment #17, and make it play nice with
HashKnownHosts. The cases I can see are:
a) "ssh hostname" stores a key for "hostname"
b) "ssh -p 222 hostname" stores a key for "hostname at 222".
c) "ssh -p 222 -o hostkeyalias=foo hostname" stores a key for "foo".
The only change in semantics I can see is for case b) when there's a key for
"hostname" but not "hostname at 222". Without the patch it'll match "hostname",
with the patch it'll give a "no matching key" error. I think this is probably
acceptable.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the openssh-bugs
mailing list