OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal

[Philip Hands]

David Rankin <drankin at bohemians.lexington.ky.us> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 02:46:49PM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Markus Friedl wrote:
> 
> > > and yes, having openssh speak SSH-2.0 would be nice.
> > > mail me if you are interested in helping implement 2.0.
> 
> > Of course!
> 
> Since it looks like there's a significant interest in this, I propose
> that we look at an "OpenSSH 2" project. At this point, we need a mailing
> list. I'd love to host the list, but the US laws make that too painful for
> me should someone post encryption code.
> 
> Once we get someone to make a list, I think we can start working on
> the details. No use flooding security at FreeBSD.org or openssh-dev-list
> with a lot of off-topic discussion (and can stop the monster CC:... :)

Would it not be better to attempt to get lsh finished off, since that
doesn't have any possible licensing problem related to the
protocol/name thing.

Regardless, there is not a vast amount of point in duplicating
efforts, so this idea should probably be mentioned to the lsh
developers to ensure that the most efficient approach can be taken to
develop one or other of these.

Cheers, Phil.