openssh bugs in snapshot for nextstep (fwd)
mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org
mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org
Wed Feb 14 05:16:55 EST 2001
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jim Knoble wrote:
> Circa 2001-Feb-12 10:23:38 -0600 dixit mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org:
>
> : I was sent this from Mark Miller. Should we be using MAXPATHLEN
> : instead of PATH_MAX in the upstream tree? Not all systems define
> : PATH_MAX.
>
> Isn't MAXPATHLEN the BSD name for PATH_MAX? I would suggest rather
> something like:
>
> #ifndef PATH_MAX
> # ifndef MAXPATHLEN
> # define MAXPATHLEN <some-arbitrary-value>
> # endif
> # define PATH_MAX MAXPATHLEN
> #endif
>
> where <some-arbitrary-value> is, if possible, guessed from the
> operating system, or at the very least chosen intelligently.
>
>
We are already doing this w/ MAXPATHLEN. It seems silly to do it for one
occurance of PATH_MAX. Everywhere else in the upstream source we use
MAXPATHLEN.
- Ben
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list