OpenSSH 2.5.0p1
Mark D. Baushke
mdb at juniper.net
Sun Feb 18 13:52:47 EST 2001
Would it make sense to have configure copy (or symlink) the
login.{c,h} and pty.{c,h} to ssh-login.{c,h} and ssh-pty.{c,h} and
have the files that need them include the ssh-{login,pty}.h ?
This way the correct files are in our repository until they are
renamed in the OpenBSD sources, but the portable version uses them
as if they were under the new names.
I really do NOT like the -I/usr/include trick as it does cause pain
when using gcc as the compiler.
-- Mark
>Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 20:46:34 -0600
>From: "William L. Jones" <jones at hpc.utexas.edu>
>
>>The best choice is renaming login.[ch] and pty.[ch] is the best
>>choice. However, doing it portable only is asking for a headache for us
>>that have to sync the trees.
>>
>>- Ben
>
>I agree that renameing login.{ch} and pty.{ch} is the best choice. The
>-I/usr/include trick is just an attempt to work around the AIX problem
>until that can happen.
>
>Bill Jones
>
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list