Updated Cray patch against openssh SNAP-20010725
William L. Jones
jones at mail.utexas.edu
Fri Jul 27 04:08:40 EST 2001
Hmm,
Your right that is what it should do!
For some reason it may not be working on Crays.
Let me do some more investgation.
Bill Jones
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Steves [mailto:stevesk at pobox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: William L. Jones
> Cc: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org; William L. Jones;
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org; jones at tacc.utexas.edu
> Subject: RE: Updated Cray patch against openssh SNAP-20010725
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, William L. Jones wrote:
> :I made the change based on the following logic:
> :
> : 1) If you have HAVE_SIGACTION then the signal is handler is
> not reset and
> : thier is no need to reset it in the signal handler.
> : 2) If you don't have HAVE_SIGACTION then the signal handler
> may or may not
> : be reset. So I do the save thing a reset it.
> :
> :Since SIGACTION is a POSIX standered I can depened on 1.
> :
> :Case 2 insure that this code will work the same as it always does if
> :you don't have SIGACTION.
>
> if you have sigaction(), mysignal() will not reset the handler if it has
> not changed, so no changes are required with the switch to mysignal. i
> just commited a change so we use mysignal() entirely for proto 1 and 2
> server loops.
>
> look in misc.c for mysignal.
>
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list