authorized_keys2 directory idea

[Markus Friedl]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 01:23:15AM -0700, Jason Stone wrote:
> I agree.  However, taking such a stand brings with it a risk of
> psuedo-forking.

no, forking is not a reason for accepting every patch.

right now openssh is already a little bit too fat,
since i did accept to many patches in the past :)

so, perhaps, we should only add patches if the remove lines from
openssh and make everything _simpler_.

remember, this is a security program:

	"complexity is the enemy"

-m