Call for testers.

[mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org]

Main concern when you have time is to test the AES implementation at this
point to know if there still needs to have stuff mucked around with
post-3.0 (sadly it does not look like Cray will get into 3.0 at this
moment).

Thanks

- Ben

On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Wendy Palm wrote:

> redhat 6.2, compiled fine.
> irix 6.5 - compiled fine.
> solaris 5.8 - compiled fine except for missing prototype
>
> *** session.c.orig      Fri Sep 14 19:01:42 2001
> --- session.c   Fri Sep 14 19:02:08 2001
> ***************
> *** 130,135 ****
> --- 130,136 ----
>   void  do_exec(Session *, const char *);
>   void  do_login(Session *, const char *);
>   void  do_child(Session *, const char *);
> + void  do_pre_login(Session *);
>   void  do_motd(void);
>   int   check_quietlogin(Session *, const char *);
>
> cray unicos - compiled fine once i added the rest of the unicos changes that
> haven't been integrated yet.
>
> (you caught me just as i was leaving for the night, so i hurried up and
> ran them).
>
> have a good weekend,
> wendy
>
>
> mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org wrote:
> >
> > http://bass.directhit.com/openssh_snap/
> >
> > Starting tonight I plan on tracking changes very closely with the OpenBSD
> > tree.  I need people to test the latest snapshot (9/14 at of right now)
> > and report success or failure on compiling.
> >
> > I am starting this now because we are looking at a code freeze soon and I
> > really want to ensure it compiles and runs on all existing platforms.  So
> > we (the portable group) is not rushing to get a release out of the door.
> >
> > Anyone with AES issues in 2.9pX (Cray, NeXT FAT binary, etc) please test
> > to see if the current snapshot supports your platform correctly.
> >
> > - Ben
>
> --
> wendy palm
> Cray OS Sustaining Engineering, Cray Inc.
> wendyp at cray.com, 651-605-9154
>