PLEASE TEST snapshots

[Kevin Steves]

On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Tim Rice wrote:
:>     Tested building from cvs today on hp-ux 10.26.  Once I applied my patch
:> (<http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=67> to bug
:> <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184>), everything built and ran
:> fine.  Is there anyway I can get this patch commited for 3.2?  If there is
:> anything I can do to help get the patch accepted please let me know.
:
:A couple of questions about your patch.
:
:--- configure.ac.orig	Fri Apr 12 20:57:56 2002
:+++ configure.ac	Sat Apr 13 10:01:51 2002
:@@ -79,6 +79,23 @@
:
:+*-*-hpux10.26)
:[snip]
:+	AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SECUREWARE_PW)

i'd prefer SecureWare here.

:+	AC_DEFINE(BROKEN_LOGIN)

i know i suggested this, but i think we need a better name for login that
can't handle "--".

:+	AC_DEFINE(TRUSTED_HPUX)

was this in the new patch?

:Are all 10.26 machines trusted HP/UX?

they are the HP-UX CMW variant.  this patch also requires "uselogin=yes".
there is also something called VVOS which might be something like 10.24 or
11.04 which is a hybrid multi-level/CMW thing.

:--- sshd.c.orig	Tue Apr  9 20:19:04 2002
:+++ sshd.c	Sat Apr 13 10:01:52 2002
:@@ -47,7 +47,10 @@
: #include <openssl/dh.h>
: #include <openssl/bn.h>
: #include <openssl/md5.h>
:-#include <openssl/rand.h>
:^^ 	was this intentional?
:+#ifdef HAVE_SECUREWARE_PW
:+#include <sys/security.h>
:+#include <prot.h>
:+#endif

there are some other issues.  i'll try to check it out soon.