[Bug 460] New: ut_addr_v6 not used
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
Mon Dec 30 08:46:52 EST 2002
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460
Summary: ut_addr_v6 not used
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.5p1
Platform: All
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/167867
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: cjwatson at debian.org
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels at cistron.nl> supplied this note and patch:
[...]
However, in IPv6 mode, sshd doesn't write the utmp 'ut_addr' field.
This patch fixes that; for 4-in-6 connections, the IPv4 address
is written to ut_addr, for IPv6 connections, the IPv6 address
is written to ut_addr_v6.
This basically is a security fix, though a minor one; Linux doesn't
have the ut_addr / ut_addr_v6 field just to leave them empty !
The next sysvinit (2.85) will include a 'last' that knows how
to read ut_addr_v6 from the wtmp file (I'm the maintainer).
diff -ruN t/openssh-3.5p1/loginrec.c openssh-3.5p1/loginrec.c
--- t/openssh-3.5p1/loginrec.c 2002-09-26 02:38:49.000000000 +0200
+++ openssh-3.5p1/loginrec.c 2002-11-05 13:14:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -609,6 +609,9 @@
construct_utmp(struct logininfo *li,
struct utmp *ut)
{
+# ifdef HAVE_ADDR_V6_IN_UTMP
+ struct sockaddr_in6 *sa6;
+# endif
memset(ut, '\0', sizeof(*ut));
/* First fill out fields used for both logins and logouts */
@@ -661,6 +664,19 @@
if (li->hostaddr.sa.sa_family == AF_INET)
ut->ut_addr = li->hostaddr.sa_in.sin_addr.s_addr;
# endif
+# ifdef HAVE_ADDR_V6_IN_UTMP
+ /* this is just a 128-bit IPv6 address */
+ if (li->hostaddr.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
+ sa6 = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&li->hostaddr.sa);
+ memcpy(ut->ut_addr_v6, sa6->sin6_addr.s6_addr, 16);
+ if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(&sa6->sin6_addr)) {
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[0] = ut->ut_addr_v6[3];
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[1] = 0;
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[2] = 0;
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[3] = 0;
+ }
+ }
+# endif
}
#endif /* USE_UTMP || USE_WTMP || USE_LOGIN */
@@ -689,6 +705,9 @@
void
construct_utmpx(struct logininfo *li, struct utmpx *utx)
{
+# ifdef HAVE_ADDR_V6_IN_UTMP
+ struct sockaddr_in6 *sa6;
+# endif
memset(utx, '\0', sizeof(*utx));
# ifdef HAVE_ID_IN_UTMPX
line_abbrevname(utx->ut_id, li->line, sizeof(utx->ut_id));
@@ -725,6 +744,19 @@
if (li->hostaddr.sa.sa_family == AF_INET)
utx->ut_addr = li->hostaddr.sa_in.sin_addr.s_addr;
# endif
+# ifdef HAVE_ADDR_V6_IN_UTMP
+ /* this is just a 128-bit IPv6 address */
+ if (li->hostaddr.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) {
+ sa6 = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&li->hostaddr.sa);
+ memcpy(ut->ut_addr_v6, sa6->sin6_addr.s6_addr, 16);
+ if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(&sa6->sin6_addr)) {
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[0] = ut->ut_addr_v6[3];
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[1] = 0;
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[2] = 0;
+ ut->ut_addr_v6[3] = 0;
+ }
+ }
+# endif
# ifdef HAVE_SYSLEN_IN_UTMPX
/* ut_syslen is the length of the utx_host string */
utx->ut_syslen = MIN(strlen(li->hostname), sizeof(utx->ut_host));
diff -ruN t/openssh-3.5p1/session.c openssh-3.5p1/session.c
--- t/openssh-3.5p1/session.c 2002-09-26 02:38:50.000000000 +0200
+++ openssh-3.5p1/session.c 2002-11-05 13:11:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -730,8 +730,8 @@
* the address be 0.0.0.0.
*/
memset(&from, 0, sizeof(from));
+ fromlen = sizeof(from);
if (packet_connection_is_on_socket()) {
- fromlen = sizeof(from);
if (getpeername(packet_get_connection_in(),
(struct sockaddr *) & from, &fromlen) < 0) {
debug("getpeername: %.100s", strerror(errno));
diff -ruN t/openssh-3.5p1/sshlogin.c openssh-3.5p1/sshlogin.c
--- t/openssh-3.5p1/sshlogin.c 2002-09-04 08:45:11.000000000 +0200
+++ openssh-3.5p1/sshlogin.c 2002-11-05 13:12:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
struct logininfo *li;
li = login_alloc_entry(pid, user, host, ttyname);
- login_set_addr(li, addr, sizeof(struct sockaddr));
+ login_set_addr(li, addr, addrlen);
login_login(li);
login_free_entry(li);
}
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list