[PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally
mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org
mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org
Mon Jan 21 07:26:45 EST 2002
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:26:15AM +0100, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > It is easy to theoretically
> > show how Nagle kills performance when you have a request-reply packet
> > based protocol.
>
> not everybody thinks like you
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?th=885385572a5a4219&seekm=990719183329.AA27312%40dojo.mi.org&frame=off
>
> but i guess, it would be better if ssh implements a nagle-like
> algorithms itself.
>
I think it would be better to see if we can avoid reinventing the wheel
and offer a NoDelay No/Yes option on the client side. Unsure about the
correct thing to do on the server side.
- Ben
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list