[PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally

[Nicolas Williams]

So you're arguing against channel-level Nagle in SSHv2? Is it too
complex?

Nico

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:49:29AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> I suspect that any attempt by ssh to "fix" that behaviour by the end
> systems will only run into trouble, so I suspect that it needs to err
> (bletch) on the side of setting TCP_NODELAY (I cannot beleive I'm
> saying it, but I am). HOWEVER, ssh code must not gratuitously further
> break-up the data stream, and if there are cases where the ssh code
> can put two otherwise unrelated but small ssh messages and give them
> to the transport at one time, that would be goodness.
> rick jones
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org mailing list
> http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
--
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.