[PATCH] Added NoDelay config option and nodelay subsystem option
Nicolas Williams
Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com
Tue Jan 29 04:58:08 EST 2002
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:23:21PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > Or are you thinking that, if you have a connection with 3 channels, one
> > of which needs TCP_NODELAY, and then that channel is closed, both
> > parties should immediately unset TCP_NODELAY?
>
> no, i'm talking about the sockets that are created on the
> peer. e.g. for -L style forwarding: should the connect()ed
> socket on the server be TCP_NODELAY'ed or not?
Oh I see. That makes sense.
> -m
Nico
--
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list