[PATCH] Added NoDelay config option and nodelay subsystem option

Nicolas Williams Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com
Wed Jan 30 03:34:06 EST 2002


On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:14:19PM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:39:43PM +0100, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > >     - turn on TCP_NODELAY for interactive sessions (Markus; current state)
> > 
> > Which goes against all logic and theory, right?  :-)
> 
> please provide information _why_ ssh-1.2.12 did it this way.

What I find, on a cursory look in google, is that users were unhappy
with the resulting latency.

> _if_ we know the reason for the current state _then_
> we can think about changing things and then we can
> change things.

I think you're right that we need a per-channel request to disable Nagle.
The question is what to do until that is possible.

Nico
--
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.




More information about the openssh-unix-dev mailing list