Issues with SFTP

[Gregory Leblanc]

On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 09:20, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:11:48AM -0800, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> > > what wrong with get?
> > 
> > why ls instead of list?
> > why get instead of suck?
> > why put instead of upload?
> > why * instead of &?
> > why sftp instead of scp?
> > hell,
> > why sftp instead of sfotp?  (the o stands for other.)
> 
> so you think sftp is only usable if it clones very possible command
> from every possible ftp client?

I believe the point that's being made is that SOME effort should be made
to make sftp act like ftp.  That is, supporting the most commonly used
commands.  Personally, I use scp and rsync via ssh, and couldn't give a
rats ass about sftp.  :-)
	Greg

-- 
Portland, Oregon, USA.