[PATCH] Minor nit: -D is now "socks" not "socks4"

[Markus Friedl]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:43:43AM -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> Darren Tucker wrote:
> 
> >Hi all.
> >	I was getting something working over socks5 and was trying to figure 
> >	out
> >why it kept using socks4.  It wasn't, it was just a misleading debug
> >message....
> >
> >	Patch applies to either OpenBSD or Portable.
> > 
> >
> We should be able to trivially support both SOCKS4 and SOCKS5, based on 
> the value in the version field of the incoming request.

we already do.

> It's important to support both, since there's alot of systems that only 
> support 4 or 5.

we already do.