Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?

[Ben Lindstrom]

There is a break point for features vs bloat.  At the time we removed
socks5 and http support because they were considered bloat.  No other
real reason.

I'd like to know the sock4 vs sock5 numbers for the userbase.  If people
are using sock5 more.  Then maybe sock4 should vanish in rebalance the
code growth.

- Ben

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Alex Peuchert wrote:

> Hi,
> just to enlighten my ignorance ;-)
>
> Why was Socks5 support removed from openssh?
>
> I also could see some useful applications for SOCKS5 over SSH ...
>
> - alex
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: openssh-unix-dev-bounces+openssh=peuchert.de at mindrot.org
> [mailto:openssh-unix-dev-bounces+openssh=peuchert.de at mindrot.org]Im
> Auftrag von Markus Friedl
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 12:51
> An: oldsleepi
> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> Betreff: Re: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?
>
>
> > has anybody seen a patch that provides socks version 5 support for the
> dynamic portforwarding feature?
>
> why?  we removed that feature:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/channels.c.diff?r1=1.1
> 08&r2=1.109
>
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>