AW: Re: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?

[Alex Peuchert]

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Markus Friedl [mailto:markus at openbsd.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2003 10:43
> An: Alex Peuchert
> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Alex Peuchert wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Markus Friedl [mailto:markus at openbsd.org]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2003 10:16
> > > An: Alex Peuchert
> > > Cc: Ben Lindstrom; openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Re: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:02:25AM +0200, Markus Friedl wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:40:36AM +0200, Alex Peuchert wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > thanks for your answer.
> > > > >
> > > > > One suggestion: How about removing the complete Port
> > > Forwardig code from ssh
> > > > > and introducing another subsystem (like sftp-server)?
> > > > >
> > > > > It could work like this: the user command is 'ssocks' which
> > > opens a ssh
> > > > > session to a server and starts the 'ssocks-server' subsystem.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this sounds quite simple...
> > > >
> > > > ...but does not work.
> > >
> > > well, it would work if you don't care about
> > > the ssh protocol or interoperability.
> > >
> >
> > within sftp you also don't care about the ssh protocol, do you? ;-)
>
> sftp has nothing to do with ssh, but port-forwarding has.
>

good point ... so, what would be the solution if I need some kind of UDP
port forwarding?