Call for testing for 3.6

[Ben Lindstrom]

Can the code be rewriten using usleep()  which has is more portable and is
easier to revert back to sleep() in the worse case (I have no clue about
nanosleep... Never used it before nor seen it used).

- Ben

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Tim Rice wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ben Lindstrom wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see more tinderbox setups (Darren, I'll be talking to you in
> > private, but I have a Sol9 box I'd like to add to the list soon).  It
> > would help to know where we stand for broken platforms.
>
> UnixWare and SCO are broken.
> I guess I'd better whip up a nanosleep() replacement.
>
> --
> Tim Rice				Multitalents	(707) 887-1469
> tim at multitalents.net
>