Testing of recent commits

[Darren Cole]

Ben,

	Previously UseLogin was required to be set in the config if you wanted 
all the security setting applied, I assume this is still reasonable.   
Darren Tucker's suggested patch seems reasonable, though I didn't test 
it either.  That would remove the need for some of the defines to be 
exclusive.  There are some similar defines in auth, and for ease of 
coding any changes in xcrypt probably should be reflected there as 
well.

	I don't know when I'll get a chance to get 10.26 working completely 
again.  Some other software porting is taking a priority, but as I get 
a chance I'll working on fixing it.

Darren

On Nov 20, 2003, at 11:34, Ben Lindstrom wrote:

>
> I could have swore I was told it was not required, but I don't have
> HP/UX.  And my initial check in comments actually elude to HP/UX
> maybe problematic.
>
> However, with your change we should do:
>
>                 pw_password = spw->sp_pwdp;
> -# endif
> -# if defined(HAVE_GETPWANAM) && !defined(DISABLE_SHADOW)
> +# elif defined(HAVE_GETPWANAM) && !defined(DISABLE_SHADOW)
>         struct passwd_adjunct *spw;
>
> Because they are all exclusive cases.  None of them should ever 
> overlap.
>
> If your diff plus this one passes then submit a patch and I'll take
> care of it.
>
> - Ben