conversation function for pam_acct_mgmt failing?

[Darren Tucker]

Brian Parent wrote:
> Thanks so much for the patches!  I applied the first set, pam-merged,
> and tested, but got the same (broken) behaviour.

You didn't happen to be using Protocol 1 for that connection, did you? 
Without the 2nd patch, its behaviour is unchanged.

>I then applied the
> pam-disconnect patches, and tested, and it worked - the message got
> through to the client ssh process, and printed out.
> 
> I ran all these tests with "ChallengeResponseAuthentication no".
> I also tested with UsePrivilegeSeparation both ways (yes and no).
> Let me know if there are any other tests you'd like me to run.
> 
> My next hurdle is to recompile and run on our linux systems.
> If there's interest, I'll let you know how that goes.

Please let us know if there's any problems.

-- 
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
     Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.