port forwarding trouble

[Jos Backus]

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:41:37AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
> Sergio Gelato wrote:
> > * Frederik Eaton [2005-08-02 17:39:59 +0100]:
> >>Also, I don't think that the "host at port" syntax suggested in the bug
> >>comments is a good idea. 
> > 
> > At the very least it should be port at host. There is precedent for that,
> > e.g. in FlexLM LM_LICENSE_FILE environment variables.
> 
> Why is that better the host at port?  I would bet there's precedent for 
> that somewhere too.

port at host preserves symmetry with user at host?

-- 
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com