OpenSSH PAM "thread" buglet
dtucker at zip.com.au
Sat Jul 16 11:37:07 EST 2005
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The current code depends on the SIGCHLD in the parent, if that gets lost,
> it will never detect it. Given that the current code already plays with
> more than one child, it's an assumption, which needs to be justified.
> Closing one side allows it to detect the death of the child nevertheless.
OK fair enough. I was able to replicate the case where the monitor dies
unexpectedly (by kill -9'ing it on Linux) and confirmed that it helps
there too. Applied, thanks.
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
More information about the openssh-unix-dev