Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithms
Rob Waite
rwaite1 at tampabay.rr.com
Thu Sep 27 13:14:41 EST 2007
>> In the code changes I sent
>> earlier... you could
>> force group exchange.
>It's the default anyway :)
If it is the default.. isn't the client software given the option to not
accept group exchange?
So by that reasoning... the client is given the power to decrease
the level of security of your server (although... I
realize that it is unlikely to actually be cracked anyway)
They can send a SSH_MSG_KEXINIT that only has group1 for example.
>The client doesn't get to choose what number they generate as it has to
>match exactly what the server generated (DH is a deterministic protocol,
>even if some of the inputs should be based on random numbers). If the
>client and server's DH output differ then the IVs and {crypto, MAC} keys
>will differ two and the connection will fail as soon as either end tries
>to send any data.
They are not able to choose the public prime but they do have the ability
to choose their private exponent. The way I read the RFC is that the
client software chooses the size of the private exponent. So it seems
that they are given control on the strength of the private key used to
encrypt their messages going out.
I guess in general cases it doesn't matter. You have given someone
a login to your server so you would have to trust that they are not
trying to be bad. Once they get the file which you have already given
them permission to... they could just give it to anyone. I guess you
are unable to control the strength of the messages that they are sending
you. And this is probably something that can't be worked around
since the client's private exponent is known to them alone... so there
is no way for the server to enforce a length.
It just seemed to me that there are some things that the server can do
to force increased security. Right now this is not configurable.. but can
be done in code. For example... the server won't allow you to pick the
key exchange methods allowed and block others that are not. This
allows a user to log into the server with an old or weak client. They
are given the control to decide to pick group1 instead of group exchange.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Damien Miller" <djm at mindrot.org>
To: "Rob Waite" <rwaite1 at tampabay.rr.com>
Cc: <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithms
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Rob Waite wrote:
>
>> Isn't dh_estimate() only used on the client to find the desired group
>> size?
>
> Yes
>
>> This is then taken by the server and used to find p and g correct?
>
> Yes
>
>> OpenSSH is not configurable in this manner... but if someone wanted to
>> force
>> larger primes...
>> couldn't they do this by altering the code?
>
> Yes - OpenSSH allows the client to request DH groups up to 8192 bits.
>
>> In the code changes I sent
>> earlier... you could
>> force group exchange.
>
> It's the default anyway :)
>
>> And if you picked only large primes in your moduli
>> file...
>> you should be able to force the client to get a large p as long as it is
>> within the min
>> and max sent by the client. I just started looking at the code again (it
>> has
>> been a while)
>> but it seems like the server can control at the very least the size of
>> the
>> public and private
>> numbers generated from p. He would not be able to control how powerful
>> the
>> client made
>> their public and private numbers from the given p... but at least data
>> sent
>> out from the server would
>> be forced to have the symmetric key encrypted using larges primes for the
>> assymmetric.
>
> The client don't have any special control over the output of the DH
> protocol - the only get to specify one input (the server specifies the
> others), and OpenSSH will refuse to accept the obviously bogus values of
> that (see dh_pub_is_valid() in dh.c).
>
>> That is assuming that the server has its own symmetric cipher key and the
>> client has their own.
>> If they do in fact share the same key... then I guess you would not be
>> protected as the client
>
> The SSH protocol uses separate keys for client-to-server and
> server-to-client.
>
>> could generate a small private number from p... no matter how large.
>
> The client doesn't get to choose what number they generate as it has to
> match exactly what the server generated (DH is a deterministic protocol,
> even if some of the inputs should be based on random numbers). If the
> client and server's DH output differ then the IVs and {crypto, MAC} keys
> will differ two and the connection will fail as soon as either end tries
> to send any data.
>
> -d
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list