Call for testing: OpenSSH-5.7

[Ángel González]

Tim Rice wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, �ngel Gonz�lez wrote:
>> Is that the prefered way for creating the configure?
>> I get a lot of "AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in
>> body" warnings with autoconf 2.68
>>
>> $ autoreconf --version
>> autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.68
>>
>> That warning was added in autoconf 2.68, because failing to provide
>> AC_LANG_SOURCE
>> could result in a "broken configure" [1].
>>
>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-autoconf@gnu.org/msg03052.html
> As Damien mentioned in another post, we use autoconf 2.61.

You wanted testing. The new autoconf warn about what autoconf guys
consider wrong syntax, thus I report. :)
Note that it's a warning, not an error. It still creates a configure and
the
resulting file passes the tests.


> That said, we could be consistant on the use of AC_LANG_SOURCE.
> Does this patch make your 2.68 happy?
It does seem to make it happier. 81 error lines instead of 288.
The errors may be coming from some included file, though.

Here are the errors after applying your patch http://pastebin.com/hywKkavP