FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default

[Dan Kaminsky]

Do you have a problem with 15 year old cars?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> wrote:

> No, I just think 15 years or so is more than enough time to have
> addressed the issue.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 14:05:08 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> > So, this isn't your problem and you don't respect the people's whose
> > problem it is.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> > > > You're right.  My argument the is the next build of OpenSSH should be
> > > > OpenSSH 7, and the one after that 8, then 9, then 10.  No minor
> releases?
> > > > Sure, go ahead.  Deprecate the point,
> > > >
> > > > Do you manage any machines running SSHv1?
> > > >
> > >
> > > If by "running" you mean accepting SSH1, of course not. From a security
> > > perspective, no one should be using SSH1.
> > >
> > > For those who, for whatever reason, need to support systems that only
> > > support SSH1, there are already sufficient solutions that have been
> > > noted multiple times on this list.
> > >
> > > Those who are still using SSH1 have already demonstrated the fact that
> > > they are slow to embrace new technology, so I would not be surprised to
> > > find that the majority of them are also slow to upgrade to newer
> > > versions of OpenSSH. I would also not be surprised to find that many of
> > > them are still using telnet to manage their routers.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Iain Morgan
> > >
>
> --
> Iain Morgan
>