Dynamic Remote Port forward?

[Rogan Dawes]

That's pretty much what I was thinking. The most significant change will be
that the client has to include the socks server code, which it doesn't
currently (I suppose!).

Or am I mistaken?

Rogan

On Sun, 8 May 2016, 21:27 Darren Tucker, <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote:

> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Markus Friedl <mfriedl at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have an ugly patch for that feature that requires protocol
> modification.
>
> Why does it require a protocol modification?  Couldn't the client
> request regular forwarded-tcpip from the server then decode SOCKS
> entirely within the client?
>
> --
> Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
> GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
>     Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
> usually comes from bad judgement.
>