Legacy option for key length?

[Michael Ströder]

David Newall wrote:
> On 02/01/18 02:22, Peter Moody wrote:
>> I would prefer that:
>>
>>   * commercial vendors patched the software they sold
> 
> We all would prefer that, but I think you know that in reality, very few
> customers have enough leverage to achieve that.  I have a number of IBM
> servers for which access to the remote console now requires old versions
> of Java and old browsers.  That's IBM.  If they're not going to update
> equipment, nobody is.  Let's not pretend the world works differently.

And how are you dealing with this particular case?

Do you keep unpatched old browsers on all end-user systems?
If yes, good luck...

Ciao, Michael.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3829 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20180102/e48143ef/attachment.p7s>