scp, sftp, and special characters in filenames

Mark Janssen maniac.nl at gmail.com
Tue Nov 5 20:50:01 AEDT 2019


That's why rsync is the better alternative to scp/sftp ... it does uploads
and downloads with the same sane syntax, and does recursive, permissions,
and doesn't need to upload/download everything again when re-trying :)

rscynv -vPar <source> <dest>


On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:35 PM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote:

> On 2019/11/04 14:28, Darren Tucker wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:07, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > [about scp] That's just awful, and I should have
> > > thought it was not at all necessary.  Am I missing something?
> > >
> >
> > If you're saying that the scp protocol is an unfixable mess then the
> > openssh team has been agreeing[0] with you for at least a decade and a
> > half.  We fix what we can, but some parts can't be fixed.
> >
> > [0] eg https://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104157774216425&w=2
>
> At various times I've tried to use sftp instead of scp but it never lasted
> long. Remembering to type sftp instead of scp isn't so bad, but file
> uploads are really hard to work with, I don't think it's possible to get
> good finger memory for "echo 'put somefile' | sftp hostname:/tmp/" (and
> it's even worse when copying out multiple files).
>
> I'm sure it's already been considered, but from a user perspective it
> would be very convenient if we could have essentially the command-line
> interface of scp(1) (with divergence for filename escaping) but using
> the SFTP protocol.
>
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>


-- 
Mark Janssen  --  mark at sig-io.nl
Unix / Linux Open-Source and Internet Consultant


More information about the openssh-unix-dev mailing list