Call for testing: OpenSSH 8.7

[Scott Neugroschl]

OK, Thanks, Ingo.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze at usta.de> 
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 10:50 AM
To: Scott Neugroschl <scott_n at xypro.com>
Cc: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>; openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH 8.7

Hi Scott,

Scott Neugroschl wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:03:02PM +0000:

> Dumb question, where's the Bugzilla?

  https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.openssh.com%2freport.html&c=E,1,zs5uflNQFRcpmUJ8sNHTMxjn649Q4a2C4xiPth4b5VAIjhmTIyxipqh2NttuPx8g4tZpgh3BpNJfFVFHvaKZhYau-_k2hbnMVU1KOZNkTXoT&typo=1  says at
  https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbugzilla.mindrot.org%2f&c=E,1,29tZJz_Xun6iIHv_SD6WhJWMl4KkV2HSZAluVB8cqIPdMBVGai2t8CepFJWiwZdUKRg3bdv-lcL-e37ACZ-bmvk4vyVjJROEKVNizPbKnRHORkmLEHoEv6HjwZs,&typo=1

but it also says that reporting bugs to <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> is OK, which you already did.

The README file in the tarball says as much.

> It's been a while for me.  There's a typo in the changelog:
>
> In the description of the configfile parser change, the text reads:
> 
> "Previously some options (e.g. DenyUsers) *to* appear on a line with 
> no subsequent arguments."

Oh, that is merely in the mail message, neither in the tarball nor anywhere on the web site.

> (emphasis mine)
> 
> The correct phrasing should be:
> 
> "Previously some options (e.g. DenyUsers) *could* appear on a line 
> with no subsequent arguments."
> 
> I'd file the bug, but I don't know where Bugzilla is.

I doubt that's needed for a typo in an email.

Yours,
  Ingo