Implementing sftp server-side timeout

[Dmitry Belyavskiy]

Dear Darren and Damien,

Do you like the proposed approach and cmdline option?

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> > Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp?
> >
> > I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of
> > logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that
> > internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure
> > to not neglect it. Thanks.
>
> I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should work
> just fine.
>
> e.g. with
>
> Subsystem       sftp    internal-sftp -l verbose -f daemon
>
> I see:
>
> Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session opened for local user
> djm from [10.130.80.1]
> Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: received client version 3
> Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: realpath "."
> Oct 21 16:47:59 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session closed for local user
> djm from [10.130.80.1]
>
> -d
>
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>
>

-- 
Dmitry Belyavskiy