tom at arcot.com
Fri Sep 19 08:24:13 EST 2003
Ben Lindstrom wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tom Wu wrote:
>>Can you be more specific about these "IP issues" you are referring to?
>>Is the IETF royalty-free statement insufficiently clear? AFAIK,
>>Stanford *has* done precisely what you indicate by providing SRP in a
>>100% free and usable way, judging by adoption in other OSS software
> It is not Stanford we worry about. It is Lucent and others that claim
> that it may infringe on their patents. You seem to forget about these
Can you substantiate the assertion that Lucent has made this claim? The
IETF IPR statement from them certainly doesn't support it, since it is
as clear a non-claim as you can get ("has not conducted a search"). If
there is no supporting evidence, please retract the statement.
Chief Security Architect
More information about the openssh-unix-dev