scp/sftp weirdness

[Erich Weiler]

Also the "PermitLocalCommand" option doesn't appear anywhere in my 
ssh_config or sshd_config...  What could be specifying that option I wonder?

ciao, erich

Erich Weiler wrote:
> As a matter of fact I do have 2 versions of OpenSSH lurking around (but 
> no Sun SSH, I didn't install it).  Maybe the new sftp is trying to 
> reference the old ssh?  I did a 'which ssh' and 'which sftp' and they 
> are both in the right place...  Does sftp reference anything else but 
> ssh?  sftp-server maybe?
> 
> The reason I have 2 versions is that my older Solaris clients are using 
> the old one and the newer Solaris 10 boxes are (trying to) using the new 
> one.
> 
> ciao, erich
> 
> Damien Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Erich Weiler wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ya'll-
>>>
>>> I'm having this weird problem with the new version of OpenSSH 
>>> compiled on Solaris, version 4.3p2.  SSH and SSHD work fine, all is 
>>> well.  But when I try to sftp or scp something I get this:
>>>
>>> % sftp bullitt
>>> Connecting to bullitt...
>>> command-line: line 0: Bad configuration option: PermitLocalCommand
>>> Connection closed
>>
>> It looks like you have your scp/sftp out of sync with your ssh binary. 
>> Perhaps OpenSSH scp/sftp are picking up Solaris' default ssh binary 
>> because it is first in your $PATH?
>>
>> -d
> 

-- 
===================================
Erich Weiler
UNIX Systems Administrator
School of Engineering
University of California Santa Cruz
weiler at soe.ucsc.edu
===================================