AcceptEnv LANG LC_* vs available locales
Thorsten Glaser
t.glaser at tarent.de
Sun May 1 09:07:29 AEST 2022
On Sun, 1 May 2022, Jochen Bern wrote:
> If that's your opinion, go ahead and implement it. Which my suggestion of a
> server-side helper evaluating the client-side-set and server-side-available
> locales
This could be… challenging. (There’s locale(1) -a, sure, but…)
It also assumes locale support on both ends in the first place.
> situation; I expect terminals to gravitate more and more towards implementing
> it, increasing the pressure on the consortium to include two codepoints to
> "shift to control" and "shift back" into its standards, laying the groundwork
> of a *global* algorithm for terminals to tell control data from content.
I highly doubt anything will change now, especially things that break
compatibility.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
****************************************************
/⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
╱ ╲ header encryption!
****************************************************
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list