Implementing sftp server-side timeout
Damien Miller
djm at mindrot.org
Fri Oct 21 16:48:58 AEDT 2022
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp?
>
> I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of
> logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that
> internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure
> to not neglect it. Thanks.
I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should work
just fine.
e.g. with
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -l verbose -f daemon
I see:
Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session opened for local user djm from [10.130.80.1]
Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: received client version 3
Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: realpath "."
Oct 21 16:47:59 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session closed for local user djm from [10.130.80.1]
-d
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list