cvs bulid breaks on slackware

[Devon Bleak]

OOPS!!!!!!!!!!!!

that _really_ went to the wrong people :((

my deepest apologies to all!!!

devon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Devon Bleak" <devon at admin2.gisnetworks.com>
To: "Devon Bleak" <devon at admin2.gisnetworks.com>;
<openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: cvs bulid breaks on slackware


> before i do my shopping i'll just answer a few of the other questions:
>
> re: the fox machine.  jordan sent an email to fox telling them about the
> larger apache process, but not recommending a memory upgrade, just saying
> "we'll keep a close watch on it to make sure that it doesn't become an
> issue."  the memory IS going to become an issue.  maybe not today, maybe
not
> next week, but if fox does their job and promotes the movies and the
> websites with the movies, it's going to become an issue very quickly and
> pretty much without notice.  which makes 'keeping a close watch on it'
> pretty pointless, especially considering the turnaround time it'd take to
> get a memory upgrade for the machine.  IMO we need to hit 'em for it NOW,
> before it's even a baby issue.
>
> re: using the e450 as a db machine for miramax.  the e450 is best known
for
> its disk space and _amazing_ disk and network i/o.  the network i/o isn't
so
> much of a feature we'd want from a db machine as the disk space and i/o
> performance.  large db's have to read large files every time someone wants
> some info from 'em.  i think that the e450 will probably be better suited
> for fox as a dedicated db machine, but if miramax wants to pay for it as a
> dedicated db machine then i'm not going to complain.  miramax could
probably
> get away with a x86 machine with dual 800's, 2GB of ram, and some software
> raid5'd disk space (we'd need at least 5 disks in the machine: 2 mirrored
OS
> drives, and 3+ 18GB raid5'd content drives, spread across at least 2 scsi
> ultra2 channels).  the e450 would be total overkill for miramax to use as
a
> dedicated db machine.  as a shared machine, it just doesn't sound right,
> especially if we'd have to tell fox.com they're going on a shared db
> machine.  if jordan hasn't told miramax they're going on a shared db
> machine, then there's really no damage done, as far as i can see.  we just
> don't put anybody else on the e450 with 'em!
>
> we might also consider putting paramount's mailgun stuff on the e450.
that
> nt machine just doesn't cut the mustard (even marcus agrees with me that
we
> need to get that thing off of NT and onto something more stable and
robust).
>
> i'll have some part no.s and specs on that ram for you shortly.
>
> devon
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Devon Bleak" <devon at admin2.gisnetworks.com>
> To: <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:43 AM
> Subject: cvs bulid breaks on slackware
>
>
> > cvs code from this morning (about 9am PST) breaks on slackware 7.1 w/
gcc
> > 2.95.2.1 with an undefined reference to session_setup_sia in session.o.
> >
> > this seems to be the culprit here:
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_OSF_SIA
> > #else /* HAVE_OSF_SIA */
> >                 session_setup_sia(pw->pw_name, ttyname);
> >
> > since i have no idea what that's trying to accomplish (and seems to be a
> bit
> > backwards to me from looking at the rest of the code dealing with sia),
i
> > figure i'll just let whoever wrote it sort it out.
> >
> > devon
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>