AW: AW: Re: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?

[Markus Friedl]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:56:48AM -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> It's really tricky to define how you'd encap UDP in SSH.  You'd almost 
> literally need a new SSH packet type, and unless we can show how it 
> would save kittens and bring peace to the middle east, that ain't going 
> to happen.

I'm not sure.  I'm considering forwarding UDP by adding a new
channel type, but only if I need this...