Privilege separation

[Dan Yefimov]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Markus Friedl wrote:

> > > privilege separation as a compile time option requires far more
> > > changes. i'd like to see no compile time options at all,
> > > but that requires some rewrite.
> > > 
> > OK, hence what exactly is wrong/missing in my patch (please don't only tell me 
> > you dislike the idea itself of it - I've already got that) ?
> 
> it's too big

The patch introducing privilege separation was much bigger. In general I see 
no constructive dialogue between me and you to be turned out - there will always 
be millions of thought up justifications for not wishing doing something.

> and i dislike the idea.
> 
No comments...

> Privilege separation would be made optional last.
> 
2all: Is there at least one maintainer around in the list that would simply
apply that simple patch without such unreasonable resistance? Up to the moment I 
heard no proved criticism against that patch.
-- 

    Sincerely Your, Dan.