Change request For OpenSSH 3.8p1

[Petr Ostadal]

Hi,

I tested 3.8p1 and it seems that pam_krb5 has been working without
threads already. I think the bug can be close for 3.8p1.

	Petr

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Petr Ostadal wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I don't like continue this flame if we have or haven't the threads.
>
> I ask, how can solve problems which forking have (see bug
> ttp://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768). Without threads the
> pam_krb5 and others pam modules doesn't work (in bugs is nicely described
> where is the problems).
>
>  Thnx in advance for your answer.
>
> 	Petr
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Petr Ostadal
> Software Developer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> SuSE CR, s.r.o. 			e-mail: postadal at suse.cz
> Drahobejlova 27 			tel:	+420 296 542 382
> 190 00 Praha 9 				fax:	+420 296 542 374
> Czech Republic 				http://www.suse.cz
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Damien Miller wrote:
>
> > I've been away from mail for a couple of days, so I am catching up on this
> > rather amusing thread.
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not terribly interested in having threads or not having threads, it
> > > was the This Will Never Happen Because I Say So And Am G-d attitude
> > > that shocked me.
> >
> > It isn't because "I" say so - you are making incorrect assumptions. For
> > instance, if I just did what I wanted, threads would have been removed by
> > now (and probably a bit more too).
> >
> > I am quite sure that I speak for all the developers when I say that we
> > don't want threads used in OpenSSH.
> >
> > -d
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> > http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
> >
>