RedHat forks OpenSSH?
Theo de Raadt
deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org
Tue Nov 9 14:49:04 EST 2004
> >>Apart from the potential legal issues (even if are just some litigious
> >>bastards suing people for fun/profit instead of real ones) surrounding
> >>said algorithms,
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Precisely what legal issues would that be?
> >
> >
> The DVD CCA's belief that there is "legal 'trade secret' protection for
> CSS".
There is no legal basis for what you are saying.
> http://www.dvdcca.org/faq.html While the OpenBSD project may not
> be an attractive target for the DVD CCA, Red Hat's lawyers may believe
> that they could be. Even if the DVD CCA is wrong and you are right, it
> could still be expensive, both in legal fees and in lost sales, for Red
> Hat to argue the point in court.
There is no legal basis for what you are saying. None.
I recommend you remove the ARC4 cipher from your machines, if you
believe so.
> >If you don't like what we write, you can run something else...
> >
> >
> Or, it can be forked, which it appears Red Hat is doing, albeit in a
> very impolite fashion.
The way they are doing it, their users no longer get any support.
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list