RedHat forks OpenSSH?

[Sten Drescher]

Theo de Raadt wrote:

>>They weren't, and if 
>>"the trade secret had been obtained through improper means",
>>    
>>
>
>Where do you get these things from?  What is 'improper means'?
>  
>
That came from the injunction against Bunner.  I thought that you had 
done your research into this?

>They do not go after you.  Not after me.  Under trade secret law they
>can ONLY GO after the people who broke the agreements.
>  
>
Then why was Bunner sued?  It's not as cut and dried as you pretend it 
to be.

>>If you're so confident of your position, how about you imdemnify Red Hat 
>>against any losses due to any trade secret litigation from the DVD CCA - 
>>or are you too much of a wimp to do that?
>>    
>>
>I have better things to do, like make sure that Red Hat's users never
>get support from the OpenSSH developers again.
>  
>
And Red Hat has better things to do than risk having to defend your 
inclusion of ACSS in OpenSSH.

Sten