Call for release testing

[Darren Tucker]

Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> said:
> 
>>We are preparing to release another stable OpenSSH soon, so once
>>again we are asking for your help in testing CVS snapshots.
> 
> I tested SNAP-20050304 on Tru64 with Enhanced Security and it passes the
> regression tests once I set BIN_SH=xpg4

Thanks.

> (otherwise the reconfigure.sh
> gets stuck in a loop; it and the Tru64 version of the Bourne shell don't
> agree).  Setting BIN_SH=xpg4 makes calls to /bin/sh get a POSIX
> compliant shell (actually Korn shell).
> 
> I remember we talked about a good way to fix this before, but I guess
> nothing ever changed.  Suggestions?

How about somthing like the attached?

(I'm not sure what uname is going to return on Tru64 and its various 
incarnations, but what I have is based on what config.guess looks for. 
Just let us know if it needs to be changed.)

-- 
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
     Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: openssh-osf1-regress.patch
Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20050305/fad659e3/attachment.ksh