--with-zlib vs. --with-ssl-dir

Darren Tucker dtucker at zip.com.au
Tue Nov 22 21:31:55 EST 2005

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:20:54PM -0500, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Unnecessarily different, right?  Why not pick one form or
> the other consistently?
>      --with-something-dir         (makes much more sense)
> or
>      --with-something             (looks like a package enabler)

I think the original intent was that the latter would be optional.
Most of the existing options of that form (eg --with-kerberos5,
--with-pam and so on) are.

Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
    Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.

More information about the openssh-unix-dev mailing list