Inconsistency with the option for defining the destination port
Scott Neugroschl
scott_n at xypro.com
Fri Jun 13 04:44:15 EST 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openssh-unix-dev-bounces+scott_n=xypro.com at mindrot.org
> [mailto:openssh-unix-dev-bounces+scott_n=xypro.com at mindrot.org] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Winter
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:42 AM
> To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> Subject: Inconsistency with the option for defining the destination
> port
>
> Why is there an inconsistency with the option for the destionation
> port.
>
> ssh -p <port> ...
> scp -P <port> ...
> sftp -P <port> ...
>
> For scp it is neccessary to be "-P" ( Quote: " Note that this option is
> written with a capital 'P', because −p is already reserved for
> preserving the times and modes of the file in rcp(1)." ).
> Also sftp uses already "-P", but ssh, still only supports/uses the
> small case. For Consistency with sftp and scp wouldn't it be best to
> add "-P" as a synonym.
Also "-f" and "-F" for specifying config files.
More information about the openssh-unix-dev
mailing list