Keeping or stopping TCP forwardings when the foreground process quits?

[Peter Stuge]

Hi,

Philipp Marek wrote:
> But the TCP forwards still worked - of course,
> as the ControlMaster process was still active!
> 
> What I'd like to ask/discuss is -- perhaps the TCP forwarding should
> (optionally, by default) be bound to the interactive SSH process -
> and when that one quits, the forwarding is stopped?

I'd also like such behavior, but I don't know if the session owner
(the Master process) can reliably tell when a Slave process exits?

A first step might be to enable Slave processes to not only add but
also remove previously established channels?


//Peter