AW: AW: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?

Alex Peuchert alex at peuchert.de
Wed Jun 25 19:11:35 EST 2003


right, but Markus removed the SOCKS5 code in revision 1.109 from channels.c
... saying that it bloads ssh

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dan Kaminsky [mailto:dan at doxpara.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2003 10:28
> An: Alex Peuchert
> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?
>
>
>
> >Well, if ssocks would be a part of the openssh distribution than
> you don't
> >have to install any software on the remote side.
> >
> >
> Right now there's _zero_ code for any of this in the server.  It's
> completely unnecessary -- the protocol and the server code are flexible
> enough to do support all sorts of interesting applications with but
> miniscule modifications on the client side.
>
> Why create unnecessary complexity?  A slight patch to the client --
> that's already been written -- is all I'm arguing for.
>
> --Dan
>
>
>




More information about the openssh-unix-dev mailing list